Here’s a puzzler for you: The Mk4 VRS was spec’d with a mk3.5 engine in Middle east (Egypt to be specific). this wasnt stated anywhere online, so the end result is a DLB engine without GPF / OPF cause we got zero enforced emission laws, yet we still have the shiny new mk4 locked down ECUs. and consequently , most performance parts that were purchased for a m Unfortunately, day one of the Polo 1.0 TSI’s long-term tests coincides with day one of lockdown 2.0. The Polo, however, does display just how versatile it is. Personally, I felt the 1.0 would be a backward step from my current 1.4 TSi DSG Golf, and the 2.0 is too much money as it is only available with 4Motion, so that left me in the middle with the 1.5 as I didn't want a diesel. As you have found, there is a long and extensive discussion on the forum about the 1.5 engine and the kangaroo problem. 2. My primary concern is the quality problem with this new 1.0 TSI engine. 3. Service was done at 15000 KM and 6 month inspection was also done, otherwise the dealer won't agree on warranty repairs. 4. I have sent many emails to Volkswagen. Other than forwarding the emails to their dealer, nothing else has been done by VW. 5. w8EYEt1. As the TBHP review mentions, "this engine begs to be driven hard"! Had the chance to take it for a spin on the highways. The engine stays around 2000 rpm at 100 kmph, doesn't feel strained at all. The is more than enough grunt on offer even at 100 kmph. At 120 kmph, the low frequency engine vibrations start to creep into the cabin. Unfortunately, day one of the Polo 1.0 TSI’s long-term tests coincides with day one of lockdown 2.0. The Polo, however, does display just how versatile it is. Powering the Polo in this specification is a 1.0-litre turbo petrol engine that produces 70kW and 175Nm of torque. The engine is mated to a five-speed manual gearbox that sends power to the front wheels. The Polo is a beautiful car to drive, and it was refreshing to drive a vehicle with a manual gearbox again, even though many consumers will Here’s a puzzler for you: The Mk4 VRS was spec’d with a mk3.5 engine in Middle east (Egypt to be specific). this wasnt stated anywhere online, so the end result is a DLB engine without GPF / OPF cause we got zero enforced emission laws, yet we still have the shiny new mk4 locked down ECUs. and consequently , most performance parts that were purchased for a m Personally, I felt the 1.0 would be a backward step from my current 1.4 TSi DSG Golf, and the 2.0 is too much money as it is only available with 4Motion, so that left me in the middle with the 1.5 as I didn't want a diesel. As you have found, there is a long and extensive discussion on the forum about the 1.5 engine and the kangaroo problem. The 1-litre TSI offers 5 bhp more than the 1.6-litre engine it replaces. There's 20 Nm more torque as well than before. With 175 Nm of pulling power, you expect the Rapid, to give chase to the more powerful cars out there and it does that with ease. The engine is refined and gets even more so, once you gain speed.

is the vw 1.0 tsi engine reliable